Philippine Bar review · Topic
De Facto and De Jure Officers
Explore De Facto and De Jure Officers in Public Office for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What principally distinguishes a de jure officer from a merely de facto officer?
- Which situation describes the usual de facto officer concept?
- What public purpose principally supports recognition of otherwise lawful official acts of a de facto officer?
- A person openly performs an existing office's duties under an apparently regular appointment later found defective. The…
- A private stranger occupies a desk and signs purported permits without appointment, election, public recognition or any…
- In an ordinary dispute about an otherwise lawful permit, one party seeks to invalidate it solely by collaterally attack…
- A de facto licensing officer issues a document granting a power that the office itself has no statutory authority to gr…
- Distinguish de jure and de facto officers. Explain why recognition of a de facto officer's otherwise lawful public acts…
- A litigant attacks an otherwise lawful official act solely because its issuer was a de facto officer rather than a de j…
- A de facto officer in good faith actually performs the duties of an office, and no de jure officer exists. Assuming all…
- Does protection of a de facto officer’s otherwise lawful public acts necessarily prove that the officer has valid de ju…
- Under Monserate’s stated general rule when a de jure officer exists, does a de facto officer’s good faith alone establi…