Pregnancy (RA 10354, Sec. 23(c))

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

1. Does the first sentence of Section23(c) protect a male applicant from employer-imposed sterilization as an employment c…
2. An employer tells a male applicant that a job offer depends on sterilization. May it defend solely by saying the pregna…
3. A supervisor avoids a written command but threatens loss of benefits unless an employee stops using modern family-plann…
4. A firm communicates through a supervisor that employees wishing to retain a benefit must submit to the employer’s selec…
5. An employer argues that Imbong invalidated the whole RH Act, so it may condition a male applicant’s hiring on steriliza…
6. Explain why Section23(c) cannot be confined to written commands from an HR director.
7. Does the sterilization-condition prohibition categorically exclude male applicants? Explain.
8. An employer invokes Imbong as a complete invalidation of Section23(c). Assess using the main disposition.