Practice question
An employer argues that Imbong invalidated the whole RH Act, so it may condition a male applicant’s hiring on sterilization. Which response accurately treats the main decision?
- Imbong upheld the Act subject to specified invalid provisions and did not strike Section23(c)’s employer prohibition
- Imbong invalidated every section without exception
- Every employer condition became lawful after Imbong
- Only the case title determines enforceability
- The main decision repealed all employee-protection laws
Legal references
- RA10354 Section23(c): https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2012/ra_10354_2012.html
- Imbong v Ochoa GR204819 April8,2014 MAIN, disposition: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2014/apr2014/gr_204819_2014.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.