Philippine Bar review · Topic
Illness and HIV Status (DO 73, s. 2005; DA 05, s. 2010; RA 11166, Sec. 49)
Page 2 of practice questions on Illness and HIV Status (DO 73, s. 2005; DA 05, s. 2010; RA 11166, Sec. 49) in Anti-Discrimination Policies. Browse published…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Does Section49 address bullying based on suspected HIV status?
- An employer creates an HIV discrimination committee but says its sole task is filing papers and it need never investiga…
- Workers repeatedly use HIV-related slurs against a colleague based on mere suspicion and post them in a group chat. Doe…
- A company refuses to adopt HIV discrimination procedures because it has no worker known to have a confirmed diagnosis. …
- An employer adopts written HIV discrimination rules but never forms the required committee or investigates a reported s…
- Outline the employer’s institutional response duties under Section48.
- Apply Section49 to repeated HIV-status name-calling in a workplace group chat where the diagnosis is merely suspected.
- Explain why lack of a publicly confirmed HIV-positive employee is not a reason to abandon preventive discrimination pro…