Philippine Bar review · Topic
Illness and HIV Status (DO 73, s. 2005; DA 05, s. 2010; RA 11166, Sec. 49)
Explore Illness and HIV Status (DO 73, s. 2005; DA 05, s. 2010; RA 11166, Sec. 49) in Anti-Discrimination Policies for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which statute supplies the current comprehensive HIV policy and expressly repealed RA 8504?
- What HIV-status bases does RA 11166 Section 49(a) protect against in workplace decisions?
- May an employer impose compulsory HIV testing merely as its own ordinary job-entry condition, without an applicable sta…
- A worker previously had TB and is now certified medically fit by the company's accredited health provider. The employer…
- An applicant is declared automatically unfit solely because of a positive Hepatitis B status, without appropriate medic…
- An employer denies promotion partly because it suspects an employee has HIV and partly because of an unrelated disputed…
- A supervisor obtains access to an employee's confidential HIV information and publishes it on the office intranet, citi…
- Explain the scope of RA 11166 Section 49(a)'s workplace protection, including uncertain status and mixed reasons.
- Distinguish the workplace legal protections for TB and Hepatitis B from a blanket rule that all illness either requires…
- An employer says any HIV information lawfully accessed for a workplace function may then be shared with all coworkers. …
- Does Section48 require workplace procedures for investigating HIV discrimination?
- What body does Section48 direct the employer to create?