Philippine Bar review · Topic

Illness and HIV Status (DO 73, s. 2005; DA 05, s. 2010; RA 11166, Sec. 49)

Explore Illness and HIV Status (DO 73, s. 2005; DA 05, s. 2010; RA 11166, Sec. 49) in Anti-Discrimination Policies for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Which statute supplies the current comprehensive HIV policy and expressly repealed RA 8504?
  2. What HIV-status bases does RA 11166 Section 49(a) protect against in workplace decisions?
  3. May an employer impose compulsory HIV testing merely as its own ordinary job-entry condition, without an applicable sta…
  4. A worker previously had TB and is now certified medically fit by the company's accredited health provider. The employer…
  5. An applicant is declared automatically unfit solely because of a positive Hepatitis B status, without appropriate medic…
  6. An employer denies promotion partly because it suspects an employee has HIV and partly because of an unrelated disputed…
  7. A supervisor obtains access to an employee's confidential HIV information and publishes it on the office intranet, citi…
  8. Explain the scope of RA 11166 Section 49(a)'s workplace protection, including uncertain status and mixed reasons.
  9. Distinguish the workplace legal protections for TB and Hepatitis B from a blanket rule that all illness either requires…
  10. An employer says any HIV information lawfully accessed for a workplace function may then be shared with all coworkers. …
  11. Does Section48 require workplace procedures for investigating HIV discrimination?
  12. What body does Section48 direct the employer to create?