Philippine Bar review · Topic
Burden of Proof
Explore Burden of Proof in Employer-Employee Relationship for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- When a claimant asserts an employment relationship that is denied, what quantum ordinarily governs proof of that relati…
- In Ditiangkin’s paid-services dispute, who bore the burden of establishing the asserted independent-contractor classifi…
- Is a signed written employment contract the only possible evidence of an employment relationship?
- A claimant names a company as her employer but supplies no relevant proof that it engaged or paid her or held employmen…
- A company admits directly engaging and paying riders but asserts they are independent contractors. It submits only the …
- Two complaints are filed. In the first, a person merely names a corporation as employer and offers no relevant connecti…
- A worker proves repeated service and the owner’s right to inspect the finished output but supplies no evidence of a rig…
- Reconcile the claimant’s ordinary initial burden to establish employment with Ditiangkin’s rule concerning independent-…
- Explain why an allegation of employment and the absence of a written contract are not conclusive in opposite directions.
- A claimant proves only that the owner may inspect output quality. Explain why that may fall short of proving employment…
- Does proof of payment alone conclusively establish every element of employment?
- Is Article295’s regular-versus-casual classification itself a substitute for first establishing an employment relations…