Practice question
Is Article295’s regular-versus-casual classification itself a substitute for first establishing an employment relationship?
- No
- Yes; every useful task automatically creates employment
- Yes; length of service alone always decides the issue
- Yes; the provision excludes the control inquiry
- Yes; every contractor becomes an employee merely by elapsed time
Legal references
- Ditiangkin v Lazada GR246892 September21,2022 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2022/sep2022/gr_246892_2022.html Evidence of retained control and economic realities.
- Hacienda San Isidro v Villaruel GR220087 August11,2025 MAIN resolution: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/aug2025/gr_220087_2025.html Employment existence precedes Article295 classification.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.