Philippine Bar review · Topic
Other Illicit Forms of Employment Arrangements
Explore Other Illicit Forms of Employment Arrangements in Contracting or Subcontracting (DO 174, s. 2017; DC 01, s. 2017; EO 51, s. 2018) for the Philippine…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which arrangement is expressly prohibited by DO 174-17 section 6?
- Under section 6(g), which document may not be required as a precondition to employment or continued employment?
- Which shorter employment term falls within the express exception in section 6(i)?
- A principal farms out work to an in-house cooperative that merely supplies workers to it. The cooperative argues that i…
- A contractor requires applicants to sign blank payrolls and a quitclaim waiving liability for all future labor claims b…
- A principal contracts out jobs currently performed by union members. Internal instructions establish that the purpose a…
- A two-year service agreement covers identical recurring work throughout its term. The contractor repeatedly hires the s…
- Identify three documentary or membership preconditions prohibited by DO 174-17 section 6(g), and explain their signific…
- Explain the rule and exception governing an employee term shorter than the service agreement under section 6(i).
- A finding establishes that an arrangement is an illicit form under DO 174-17 section 6. What employment consequence fol…
- Does Section 6(d) include a lockout as well as a strike in its stated prohibited contracting arrangement?
- Does Section 6(d) require the strike or lockout already to have begun before its stated prohibition can matter?