Philippine Bar review · Topic

Other Illicit Forms of Employment Arrangements

Explore Other Illicit Forms of Employment Arrangements in Contracting or Subcontracting (DO 174, s. 2017; DC 01, s. 2017; EO 51, s. 2018) for the Philippine…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Which arrangement is expressly prohibited by DO 174-17 section 6?
  2. Under section 6(g), which document may not be required as a precondition to employment or continued employment?
  3. Which shorter employment term falls within the express exception in section 6(i)?
  4. A principal farms out work to an in-house cooperative that merely supplies workers to it. The cooperative argues that i…
  5. A contractor requires applicants to sign blank payrolls and a quitclaim waiving liability for all future labor claims b…
  6. A principal contracts out jobs currently performed by union members. Internal instructions establish that the purpose a…
  7. A two-year service agreement covers identical recurring work throughout its term. The contractor repeatedly hires the s…
  8. Identify three documentary or membership preconditions prohibited by DO 174-17 section 6(g), and explain their signific…
  9. Explain the rule and exception governing an employee term shorter than the service agreement under section 6(i).
  10. A finding establishes that an arrangement is an illicit form under DO 174-17 section 6. What employment consequence fol…
  11. Does Section 6(d) include a lockout as well as a strike in its stated prohibited contracting arrangement?
  12. Does Section 6(d) require the strike or lockout already to have begun before its stated prohibition can matter?