Philippine Bar review · Topic
Natural and Probable Consequences
Explore Natural and Probable Consequences in Concept for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which sequence is central to the judicial definition of proximate cause?
- Must a proximate cause always be the event closest in time to the injury?
- Why is proving that an injury happened after the defendant acted insufficient by itself?
- A negligent worker leaves a wheeled cart unsecured on a slope. It rolls downhill and strikes a pedestrian in the ordina…
- A person’s old purchase of a chair merely explains why the person was at a shop years later. At that later visit, a who…
- A negligently obstructed exit remains blocked during a foreseeable emergency. Occupants respond to an alarm in an ordin…
- A claimant proves that a remote act supplied only the setting for an injury. The court finds that a distinct, unrelated…
- Explain the natural-and-continuous-sequence concept of proximate cause and the significance of an efficient intervening…
- A negligent act starts a foreseeable sequence that naturally produces injury, but a later physical event delivers the f…
- Distinguish a remote circumstance that merely furnishes the occasion from negligence producing injury as its natural an…
- Is proof that one accident caused a burn necessarily proof that it proximately caused a later death during unrelated or…
- Does financial sponsorship alone necessarily make a sponsor the proximate cause of every injury at an event?