Philippine Bar review · Topic

Natural and Probable Consequences

Explore Natural and Probable Consequences in Concept for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Which sequence is central to the judicial definition of proximate cause?
  2. Must a proximate cause always be the event closest in time to the injury?
  3. Why is proving that an injury happened after the defendant acted insufficient by itself?
  4. A negligent worker leaves a wheeled cart unsecured on a slope. It rolls downhill and strikes a pedestrian in the ordina…
  5. A person’s old purchase of a chair merely explains why the person was at a shop years later. At that later visit, a who…
  6. A negligently obstructed exit remains blocked during a foreseeable emergency. Occupants respond to an alarm in an ordin…
  7. A claimant proves that a remote act supplied only the setting for an injury. The court finds that a distinct, unrelated…
  8. Explain the natural-and-continuous-sequence concept of proximate cause and the significance of an efficient intervening…
  9. A negligent act starts a foreseeable sequence that naturally produces injury, but a later physical event delivers the f…
  10. Distinguish a remote circumstance that merely furnishes the occasion from negligence producing injury as its natural an…
  11. Is proof that one accident caused a burn necessarily proof that it proximately caused a later death during unrelated or…
  12. Does financial sponsorship alone necessarily make a sponsor the proximate cause of every injury at an event?