Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Natural and Probable Consequences

Multiple Choice Easy

Practice question

Which sequence is central to the judicial definition of proximate cause?
  1. Any sequence in which the defendant was alive before the injury.
  2. Only the plaintiff’s preferred story regardless of proof.
  3. A natural and continuous causal sequence producing injury, unbroken by an efficient intervening cause.
  4. Any sequence of unrelated events.
  5. Only the last signature on any document.

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html — Civil Code, article2176.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr_164749_2017.html — Abrogar v Cosmos Bottling, GR 164749, March 15 2017, main opinion: natural continuous chain and efficient intervening cause.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2023/jun2023/gr_254395_2023.html — Davao del Norte Electric Cooperative v Heirs of Lucas, GR 254395, June 14 2023, main opinion: foreseeable causal sequence.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.