Philippine Bar review · Topic

Use of Artificial Intelligence (Secs. 5–6; See also AM 25-11-28-SC)

Explore Use of Artificial Intelligence (Secs. 5–6; See also AM 25-11-28-SC) in Competence and Diligence (Canon VI) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Under CJCA Canon VI, Section 6, what is the proper role of AI in a judge's work?
  2. Under the February 18, 2026 AI Governance Framework, does using AI diminish a user's responsibility for the output and …
  3. What does the Framework require of AI outputs notwithstanding automated or semi-automated processing?
  4. A judge uses an AI tool to translate material for a court-issued document in an adjudicatory function. The judge says o…
  5. An AI-assisted legal-research output contains an apparently useful but nonexistent decision. The judge discovers the pr…
  6. A judge receives a fluent AI-generated draft deciding a disputed case. Without independently evaluating the record or g…
  7. A court proposes an AI tool trained on incomplete data that systematically disadvantages a vulnerable group. The propos…
  8. Explain why an AI-assisted draft cannot replace a judge's own decision-making under CJCA Canon VI, Section 6 and the Fe…
  9. A judge uses AI for transcription, translation and proofreading in preparing a court-issued adjudicatory document. Anal…
  10. A judge proposes accepting AI recommendations without review because technology is supposedly free of human prejudice. …
  11. Under the February2026 AI Governance Framework, what is required before implementing any AI tool in any part of the Jud…
  12. How does the Framework classify predictive AI and its outputs for risk assessment?