Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Use of Artificial Intelligence (Secs. 5–6; See also AM 25-11-28-SC)

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A court proposes an AI tool trained on incomplete data that systematically disadvantages a vulnerable group. The proposal calls the tool neutral solely because it is automated and requires officials to accept every output. Which response best follows the Framework?
  1. Automation proves neutrality
  2. Incomplete training data cannot cause bias
  3. Vulnerable groups are outside the fairness principle
  4. The proposal conflicts with fairness and human-oversight requirements; automation neither guarantees neutrality nor justifies compulsory unreviewed adoption
  5. The vendor alone decides whether constitutional rights matter

Legal references

  • A.M. No. 25-11-28-SC, February 18, 2026, AI Governance Framework, Part II (human-centered use, transparency, accountability and fairness): https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/11/101138
  • 2025 CJCA, Canon VI, Sections 5–6: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/11/100836

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.