Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Topic

Use of Artificial Intelligence (Secs. 5–6; See also AM 25-11-28-SC)

Page 2 of practice questions on Use of Artificial Intelligence (Secs. 5–6; See also AM 25-11-28-SC) in Competence and Diligence (Canon VI). Browse published…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Does the Framework’s scope include vendors designing AI tools on behalf of the Judiciary? Multiple Choice Easy
  2. A judge proposes entering sealed, sensitive records into a public AI service without express authority, arguing that th… Multiple Choice Medium
  3. A proposed court AI tool has undergone an assessment, but users receive only unexplained technical risk scores. What ad… Multiple Choice Medium
  4. A proposed judicial AI system promises efficiency. Reliable evidence shows that its use would cause serious, irreversib… Multiple Choice Hard
  5. A court proposes an AI-driven restriction affecting a person’s fundamental rights. The restriction has no legal basis a… Multiple Choice Hard
  6. A judge wants to place privileged case information into an AI service because it can produce a useful chronology. Ident… Essay Medium
  7. A proposed predictive AI tool will assist court operations. Explain the assessment duties without treating the predicti… Essay Medium
  8. A court has two AI options achieving the same legitimate purpose; one imposes substantially greater energy and water co… Essay Medium