Philippine Bar review · Topic
Use of Artificial Intelligence (Secs. 5–6; See also AM 25-11-28-SC)
Page 2 of practice questions on Use of Artificial Intelligence (Secs. 5–6; See also AM 25-11-28-SC) in Competence and Diligence (Canon VI). Browse published…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Does the Framework’s scope include vendors designing AI tools on behalf of the Judiciary? Multiple Choice Easy
- A judge proposes entering sealed, sensitive records into a public AI service without express authority, arguing that th… Multiple Choice Medium
- A proposed court AI tool has undergone an assessment, but users receive only unexplained technical risk scores. What ad… Multiple Choice Medium
- A proposed judicial AI system promises efficiency. Reliable evidence shows that its use would cause serious, irreversib… Multiple Choice Hard
- A court proposes an AI-driven restriction affecting a person’s fundamental rights. The restriction has no legal basis a… Multiple Choice Hard
- A judge wants to place privileged case information into an AI service because it can produce a useful chronology. Ident… Essay Medium
- A proposed predictive AI tool will assist court operations. Explain the assessment duties without treating the predicti… Essay Medium
- A court has two AI options achieving the same legitimate purpose; one imposes substantially greater energy and water co… Essay Medium