Philippine Bar review · Topic
Principle 21
Explore Principle 21 in Stockholm Declaration (1972) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which two ideas are joined in Stockholm Principle 21?
- Principle 21 addresses activities within a State's jurisdiction or what?
- Which environmental areas are protected in the wording of Principle 21?
- A State says its sovereign right over resources means Principle 21 contains no responsibility for damage abroad. Is tha…
- A harmful activity is privately operated but lies within State A's jurisdiction. A says Principle 21 cannot be relevant…
- An activity under State A's control threatens an environment beyond all national jurisdiction. A argues there can be no…
- A claimant argues that any cross-border environmental injury conclusively proves a breach, without examining conduct or…
- Explain the relationship between resource sovereignty and environmental responsibility in Stockholm Principle21.
- Does private ownership of a polluting activity exclude the State's preventive environmental obligations?
- Distinguish Principle21's wording from a claim that the State guarantees zero environmental harm in every circumstance.
- Which qualification accompanies resource sovereignty in Stockholm Principle 21’s wording?
- In Pulp Mills, what preventive assessment did the ICJ recognize for proposed industrial activity risking significant ad…