Philippine Bar review · Topic
Immunity of Public Officers
Explore Immunity of Public Officers in Public Office for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What does Section 38(1) of the Administrative Code require to overcome its stated protection from civil liability for a…
- Under the presidential-immunity rule reiterated in Nepomuceno, what circumstance is central to protection of the Presid…
- Does a subordinate officer automatically escape civil liability merely by asserting superior orders?
- A department secretary is sued personally for damages from acts established to have been malicious and outside lawful a…
- A department head is sued solely because a subordinate committed a wrongful act. The facts establish no personal miscon…
- A domestic civil action names the actual incumbent President personally and concerns an allegedly private act. The clai…
- A former President, whose incumbency has ended, faces a proper proceeding concerning alleged misconduct while previousl…
- Explain the qualified civil-liability protection in Section 38(1) of the Administrative Code. Does official status make…
- State the temporal nature of presidential immunity from domestic suit, including Nepomuceno's treatment of official and…
- A subordinate willfully commits an act contrary to law under a superior's instructions. Explain why the instructions al…
- Under Administrative Code Section 38(2), what period governs performance of a duty when no law or regulation fixes one?
- Under Section 38(2), unjustified neglect of a duty within the applicable period can make a public officer liable for wh…