Philippine Bar review · Topic

Liability of Corporate Officers; Exceptions

Explore Liability of Corporate Officers; Exceptions in Reliefs for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Does a corporation's liability for illegal dismissal automatically make every corporate officer personally liable?
  2. In Borromeo v. Lazada, what circumstance was identified as a basis for holding corporate directors or officers solidari…
  3. Which conduct by directors or trustees is expressly covered by Section30 of the Revised Corporation Code?
  4. A corporation is found liable for illegal dismissal. The record shows no officer malice or bad faith and no other basis…
  5. An officer deliberately fabricates a misconduct charge and personally orders an unlawful dismissal to punish an employe…
  6. A corporation is found to have illegally dismissed an employee after wrongly classifying the worker as an independent c…
  7. The president and one director knowingly devise a fabricated charge and direct an illegal dismissal for personal retali…
  8. A corporation is held liable for illegal dismissal. Its president was joined solely because of that office; no malice, …
  9. An officer personally fabricates a charge and directs an illegal dismissal to retaliate against an employee. The malici…
  10. Explain Borromeo v. Lazada's distinction between an illegal dismissal and corporate officers' personal solidary liabili…
  11. Apart from bad-faith participation, which recognized exceptional basis may support an officer’s personal solidary liabi…
  12. Can a specific law expressly making an officer personally liable be ignored solely because the corporation has a separa…