Philippine Bar review · Topic
Liability of Corporate Officers; Exceptions
Explore Liability of Corporate Officers; Exceptions in Reliefs for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Does a corporation's liability for illegal dismissal automatically make every corporate officer personally liable?
- In Borromeo v. Lazada, what circumstance was identified as a basis for holding corporate directors or officers solidari…
- Which conduct by directors or trustees is expressly covered by Section30 of the Revised Corporation Code?
- A corporation is found liable for illegal dismissal. The record shows no officer malice or bad faith and no other basis…
- An officer deliberately fabricates a misconduct charge and personally orders an unlawful dismissal to punish an employe…
- A corporation is found to have illegally dismissed an employee after wrongly classifying the worker as an independent c…
- The president and one director knowingly devise a fabricated charge and direct an illegal dismissal for personal retali…
- A corporation is held liable for illegal dismissal. Its president was joined solely because of that office; no malice, …
- An officer personally fabricates a charge and directs an illegal dismissal to retaliate against an employee. The malici…
- Explain Borromeo v. Lazada's distinction between an illegal dismissal and corporate officers' personal solidary liabili…
- Apart from bad-faith participation, which recognized exceptional basis may support an officer’s personal solidary liabi…
- Can a specific law expressly making an officer personally liable be ignored solely because the corporation has a separa…