Philippine Bar review · Topic

Post-employment Restrictions; Elements of Validity

Explore Post-employment Restrictions; Elements of Validity in Management Prerogative for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. How does Tiu v. Platinum Plans treat post-employment noncompetition clauses?
  2. Which dimensions are expressly relevant to the reasonableness of a non-involvement clause discussed in Tiu?
  3. What employer interest was material in upholding the particular restriction in Tiu?
  4. An employer argues that its covenant must be valid because the worker signed it, even though its substantive scope is c…
  5. A clause bars a former employee from every occupation throughout the Philippines for five years without written permiss…
  6. A senior territorial executive knows a pre-need company’s confidential marketing strategy. Her covenant restricts invol…
  7. A trading group employs a worker only to purchase one agricultural product. Its covenant later bars her from every busi…
  8. Explain the principal considerations in determining whether a post-employment noncompetition clause is enforceable.
  9. Why does a short duration not necessarily save a restriction covering many unrelated business activities?
  10. Distinguish a tailored confidentiality-related restraint from a ban on all future occupations.
  11. A clause bars specified competitive activity for two years after separation. What event starts that post-employment per…
  12. Does establishing that a noncompetition clause is valid automatically establish that every later job breaches it?