Acts of Public Officers

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

1. Under Article 27, what conduct can support the specified damages action against a public servant or employee?
2. Does the fact that a defendant is a public officer automatically defeat every civil damages claim?
3. What additional concept did the December 2008 Vinzons-Chato resolution emphasize for a private tort damages claim?
4. An officer without just cause refuses a duty specifically owed under law to an applicant, causing proved material loss.…
5. A claimant proves only dislike of an otherwise lawful official decision and no violation of a duty owed to the claimant…
6. A claim is governed by Administrative Code section 38(1), and no other special liability basis is asserted. The claiman…
7. A plaintiff seeks damages from an officer for an alleged rights violation but proves no particular legal injury or caus…
8. Explain Article 27’s public-officer liability rule and why it supports neither blanket immunity nor automatic damages f…
9. What does the December 2008 Vinzons-Chato resolution teach about particular legal injury in a private damages action co…
10. A claim is expressly governed solely by Administrative Code section 38(1). Explain why a later reversal of an official …
11. Under Administrative Code Section 38(3), is a superior automatically civilly liable for every subordinate’s wrongful ac…
12. Does Section 39 make a superior’s instruction a universal defense for a subordinate’s willful or negligent act contrary…