Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Acts of Public Officers

Multiple Choice Easy Jurisprudence

Practice question

What additional concept did the December 2008 Vinzons-Chato resolution emphasize for a private tort damages claim?
  1. The plaintiff’s membership in any political party.
  2. The plaintiff’s disagreement with every tax policy.
  3. The officer’s wealth alone.
  4. A particular legal injury and a relevant duty owed to the claimant, rather than disagreement with a public act alone.
  5. Automatic damages whenever a circular is questioned.

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html — Civil Code, articles 27 and32.
  • https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/48330 — Vinzons-Chato v Fortune Tobacco, GR 141309, December 23 2008, main resolution: particular legal injury and public duty.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/jun2024/gr_234680_2024.html — Supreme Court GR 234680, June 2024, main opinion: Administrative Code Book I section 38.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.