Philippine Bar review · Topic

Immediate Possession of Expropriated Land

Page 2 of practice questions on Immediate Possession of Expropriated Land in Expropriation (Rule 67; RA 10752, as amended by RA 12289). Browse published…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. If the owner is deceased and the estate unsettled after the required diligence, does Section 7(b) provide a court-depos…
  2. For a covered transaction, the applicable approved-SMV amounts are stipulated as PHP 1,000,000 land, PHP 200,000 legall…
  3. No approved RA 12001 SMV exists. Counsel applies BIR land zonal valuation indiscriminately to improvements and crops as…
  4. A private internet-service company seeks statutory immediate possession solely because it supplies a listed public serv…
  5. A covered urgent project has no land classification. The agency proposes an arbitrary remote-city price instead of the …
  6. Compute and explain the three components in the stipulated PHP 1,000,000/PHP 200,000/PHP 100,000 example.
  7. Explain the court-deposit route when an owner is deceased and the estate remains unsettled.
  8. Why does an entity’s public-service business not alone establish entitlement to the amended possession mechanism?