Philippine Bar review · Topic
Immediate Possession of Expropriated Land
Explore Immediate Possession of Expropriated Land in Expropriation (Rule 67; RA 10752, as amended by RA 12289) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- In a case governed by the amended right-of-way statute, is the possession deposit necessarily the same as final just co…
- For land, what percentage of market value is specified in the amended Section7(a)(1) possession-deposit formula?
- Once the amended Section7(a) guidelines are complied with, how is the possession writ issued?
- A 2026 covered project has no approved schedule of market values under RA12001. For the land component, what interim va…
- Two persons make conflicting ownership claims over property in a covered amended-Section7 proceeding. May the agency si…
- For a covered transaction after the amendment’s effectivity, no protected prior written compensation agreement exists. …
- An agency wants to occupy a parcel immediately and says public importance alone allows entry without the required compl…
- Describe the amended Section7(a) possession deposit for a covered transaction with an approved RA12001 SMV.
- Explain the treatment of conflicting ownership claims under amended Section7(b).
- Why must an immediate-possession question identify whether Rule67 or a special right-of-way statute governs?
- For a covered amended-Section 7 deposit, what percentage applies to the market value of crops and trees?
- What does amended Section 7(a)(2) state for the improvement-and-structure component?