Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Immediate Possession of Expropriated Land

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A covered urgent project has no land classification. The agency proposes an arbitrary remote-city price instead of the statutory adjacent-vicinity comparable basis. Which is correct under Section 7(d)?
  1. Urgency always authorizes any chosen remote value.
  2. The prescribed SMV and classification of similar adjacent-vicinity land, or interim BIR zonal basis where applicable, must be used.
  3. The court cannot examine the stated alternative.
  4. An agency’s preference automatically is an approved SMV.
  5. No comparative-land safeguard exists.

Legal references

  • RA 12289, Sections 3 and 7-8, amending RA 10752 coverage and its renumbered Sections 7-8 on possession and valuation: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/99855

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.