Philippine Bar review · Topic
Penalties
Explore Penalties in Unauthorized Practice of Law for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which Rule 71 ground expressly addresses assuming to be an attorney and acting as such without authority?
- Before punishment for indirect contempt under Section 3, is an opportunity to comment and be heard required?
- Does Rule 71 Section 7 prescribe one identical mandatory sentence for every indirect-contempt case in every court?
- A person falsely holds himself out as counsel and acts in that capacity without authority. The client’s consent is offe…
- An authorized lawyer knowingly helps a disbarred lawyer continue holding himself out as counsel. Is discipline categori…
- A complainant asks a court to imprison an alleged fake counsel immediately under the indirect-contempt ground, without …
- A lawyer knowingly co-signs a pleading with a disbarred former partner, holding both out as authorized counsel. He argu…
- Explain the Rule 71 route when a person assumes to be an attorney and acts without authority.
- Why can a lawyer who helps a disbarred person continue practicing face separate liability? Apply Gonzales.
- A client consented to representation by a person who falsely claimed counsel authority. Does consent eliminate the pote…
- For indirect contempt committed against an RTC or court of equivalent or higher rank, what is Section7’s maximum fine?
- What is Section7’s imprisonment ceiling for indirect contempt committed against a lower court?