Philippine Bar review · Topic
Justices, Judges, and Court Employees (CJCA, Canon IV, Secs. 16 and 19; 2025 Code of Conduct and Accountability for Court Officials and Personnel, AM 25-06-11-SC, Canon II, Secs. 8–9)
Page 2 of practice questions on Justices, Judges, and Court Employees (CJCA, Canon IV, Secs. 16 and 19; 2025 Code of Conduct and Accountability for Court…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What specific authority does personnel Section9(e) require for outside employment with the legislative or executive bra… Multiple Choice Easy
- A court employee seeks a second job with a company supplying services to the Judiciary. The company is not a law firm. … Multiple Choice Medium
- A judge’s teaching repeatedly causes missed hearings and detracts from principal judicial duties. May the judge rely so… Multiple Choice Medium
- A court employee obtains the head of office’s consent for a second executive-branch job but has no specific Supreme Cou… Multiple Choice Hard
- A lawyer in court service relies on the immediate-family appearance route to represent a private friend who is not an i… Multiple Choice Hard
- Explain why an outside employer’s lack of law-firm status does not alone satisfy personnel Section9(b). Essay Medium
- Distinguish head-of-office approval from the specific authority for outside legislative or executive employment. Essay Medium
- A judge invokes permission to write and lecture even though the activities displace principal duties. Explain the quali… Essay Medium