Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Justices, Judges, and Court Employees (CJCA, Canon IV, Secs. 16 and 19; 2025 Code of Conduct and Accountability for Court Officials and Personnel, AM 25-06-11-SC, Canon II, Secs. 8–9)

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A lawyer in court service relies on the immediate-family appearance route to represent a private friend who is not an immediate family member. The lawyer has no separate Supreme Court authorization to practice privately. Which is correct?
  1. The family route does not cover the stated friend, and the general private-practice restriction remains
  2. Every friendship is immediate family under the route
  3. A client’s request automatically supplies Supreme Court authority
  4. Only the lawyer’s intention matters
  5. Every unpaid private case is automatically authorized

Legal references

  • 2025 Code of Judicial Conduct and Accountability, AM25-04-04-SC, November11,2025, CanonIV Sections16,19(a): https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/11/100836
  • 2025 Code of Conduct and Accountability for Court Officials and Personnel, AM25-06-11-SC, October28,2025, CanonII Sections8–9: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/11/100842

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.