Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Justices, Judges, and Court Employees (CJCA, Canon IV, Secs. 16 and 19; 2025 Code of Conduct and Accountability for Court Officials and Personnel, AM 25-06-11-SC, Canon II, Secs. 8–9)

Multiple Choice Medium Jurisprudence

Practice question

A court employee seeks a second job with a company supplying services to the Judiciary. The company is not a law firm. Does that fact alone satisfy Section9(b)?
  1. No; the condition separately includes entities dealing with the Judiciary
  2. Yes; only law firms are excluded
  3. Yes; every supplier is automatically approved
  4. Only the employee’s preferred hours matter
  5. Only the company’s tax receipt matters

Legal references

  • 2025 Code of Judicial Conduct and Accountability, AM25-04-04-SC, November11,2025, CanonIV Sections16,19(a): https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/11/100836
  • 2025 Code of Conduct and Accountability for Court Officials and Personnel, AM25-06-11-SC, October28,2025, CanonII Sections8–9: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/11/100842

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.