Practice question
A court proposes an AI-driven restriction affecting a person’s fundamental rights. The restriction has no legal basis and a less intrusive method would achieve the same aim. Officials defend it solely as technologically innovative. Which is correct?
- Innovation does not dispense with legal basis, proportionality, necessity and the least intrusive means.
- Innovation alone supplies a legal basis.
- Automated restrictions are exempt from human-rights requirements.
- Only financial cost determines validity.
- A vendor may conclusively decide constitutional limits.
Legal references
- AI Governance Framework, AM25-11-28-SC, February18,2026, PartII Sections2,6–8 and PartI scope: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/11/101138
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.