Philippine Bar review · Topic
Secondary Evidence
Explore Secondary Evidence in Documentary Evidence for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What foundation does Rule 130 section 5 require before proving a lost original’s contents by secondary evidence?
- In what order does section 5 list methods of proving the unavailable original’s contents?
- If the original is controlled by the adverse party, what does section 6 require before invoking that secondary-evidence…
- A contract original was destroyed by an accidental fire. Its execution and destruction without bad faith are establishe…
- A public record’s original is kept by its lawful public custodian. How may its contents be proved under section 8?
- A counterpart accurately reproduces the original by a method qualifying as a duplicate. No genuine authenticity questio…
- A claim depends only on the general result of thousands of transactions that cannot be examined in court without great …
- State the foundation and order of secondary proof when an original is unavailable under Rule 130 section 5.
- Distinguish the adverse-custody, public-record and voluminous-record routes under the current Rule.
- Why should a court distinguish a qualifying duplicate from secondary proof offered because the original was lost?
- Under Rule130 Section9, does inspecting a document requested for production oblige the requesting party to offer it?
- Does Section3(e) recognize an exception when the original is not closely related to a controlling issue?