Philippine Bar review · Topic

Secondary Evidence

Explore Secondary Evidence in Documentary Evidence for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What foundation does Rule 130 section 5 require before proving a lost original’s contents by secondary evidence?
  2. In what order does section 5 list methods of proving the unavailable original’s contents?
  3. If the original is controlled by the adverse party, what does section 6 require before invoking that secondary-evidence…
  4. A contract original was destroyed by an accidental fire. Its execution and destruction without bad faith are establishe…
  5. A public record’s original is kept by its lawful public custodian. How may its contents be proved under section 8?
  6. A counterpart accurately reproduces the original by a method qualifying as a duplicate. No genuine authenticity questio…
  7. A claim depends only on the general result of thousands of transactions that cannot be examined in court without great …
  8. State the foundation and order of secondary proof when an original is unavailable under Rule 130 section 5.
  9. Distinguish the adverse-custody, public-record and voluminous-record routes under the current Rule.
  10. Why should a court distinguish a qualifying duplicate from secondary proof offered because the original was lost?
  11. Under Rule130 Section9, does inspecting a document requested for production oblige the requesting party to offer it?
  12. Does Section3(e) recognize an exception when the original is not closely related to a controlling issue?