Philippine Bar review · Topic
Factum Probans vs. Factum Probandum
Explore Factum Probans vs. Factum Probandum in General Provisions and Principles (Rule 128) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What does factum probandum denote in the evidence analysis described in Dela Llana v. Biong?
- What does factum probans denote in that distinction?
- Does identifying a circumstance as a factum probans necessarily establish the factum probandum conclusively?
- In a debt case, the contested ultimate factual issue is whether payment occurred. A properly authenticated receipt is o…
- A claimant must establish that a collision caused the particular injury sued upon. Photographs show car damage but do n…
- In a disputed delivery claim, the plaintiff identifies the ultimate fact as delivery to the buyer. The admitted dispatc…
- A plaintiff alleges that the defendant forged a signature and offers a handwriting expert's properly received compariso…
- Distinguish factum probandum from factum probans and explain their relationship.
- In a dispute where payment is denied, identify the factum probandum and give examples of possible facta probantia witho…
- How can identifying the factum probandum help counsel avoid presenting a large amount of evidence that fails to establi…
- If the disputed ultimate fact is whether notice was received, what role may a reliable acknowledgment of receipt play?
- Can several facta probantia bear on one disputed ultimate fact?