Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Factum Probans vs. Factum Probandum

Multiple Choice Easy

Practice question

Does identifying a circumstance as a factum probans necessarily establish the factum probandum conclusively?
  1. Yes; every supporting fact is conclusive
  2. Yes; no inference ever needs evaluation
  3. Yes; relevance and sufficiency are identical
  4. No; its connection and persuasive sufficiency must still be assessed
  5. No; supporting facts can never establish an ultimate fact

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/pdf/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.pdf — A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC, 2019 Revised Rules on Evidence, effective May 1, 2020; Rules 128 §§1–4, 130 §§1–2, 131 §1, and 133 §§1–2,6.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2013/dec2013/gr_182356_2013.html — Dela Llana v. Biong, G.R. No. 182356, December 4, 2013, MAIN decision (evidentiary facts, ultimate fact, and admissibility versus weight).

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.