Philippine Bar review · Topic

Factum Probans vs. Factum Probandum

Page 2 of practice questions on Factum Probans vs. Factum Probandum in General Provisions and Principles (Rule 128). Browse published questions and explore…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Is an asserted supporting circumstance necessarily a proved fact merely because counsel calls it factum probans?
  2. The ultimate disputed issue is whether a building was destroyed by fire. Admitted photographs of fire damage and reliab…
  3. The issue is whether a tenant received a termination notice. An admitted printing log proves only that a notice was pri…
  4. A claimant must establish that stored stock was destroyed in a flood. Records prove a flood affected the town, but reli…
  5. A plaintiff identifies contractual notice as the ultimate disputed fact but offers only proof that the defendant once b…
  6. In a notice dispute, distinguish proof that a notice was printed from proof that it was received.
  7. A flood occurred in a town, but disputed stock may have been removed before the flood. Explain the factum analysis for …
  8. Explain how multiple independent evidentiary facts can support one ultimate fact without turning labels into proof.