Philippine Bar review · Topic

Trial In Absentia

Explore Trial In Absentia in Trial (Rule 119) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What prior procedural event is required for constitutional trial in absentia?
  2. Besides arraignment, what two conditions does ArticleIII Section14(2) state?
  3. Does trial in absentia automatically mean conviction?
  4. An accused was never arraigned and remains at large. May the court convict through trial in absentia merely because a w…
  5. An arraigned accused is duly notified but offers a substantiated justifiable reason for missing the hearing. May absenc…
  6. Two co-accused were arraigned; a third was never arrested or arraigned. All later become absent. The court proposes tre…
  7. An accused is arraigned, duly notified and unjustifiably absent, so trial lawfully proceeds. The prosecution then rests…
  8. State the constitutional requirements for trial in absentia.
  9. Explain Caloring’s treatment of an unarraigned accused convicted while at large.
  10. Why is lawful trial in absentia not equivalent to a default conviction?
  11. For an arraigned accused who escapes from custody, what does current Rule 115, Section 1(c) provide regarding subsequen…
  12. A bailed accused is absent without justification from one notified trial date but has not escaped from custody. Does th…