Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Trial In Absentia

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

Two co-accused were arraigned; a third was never arrested or arraigned. All later become absent. The court proposes treating the third as arraigned because the others pleaded. Which is correct?
  1. The third accused’s unfulfilled arraignment requirement cannot be supplied by co-accused pleas
  2. Every joint information shares one plea for all accused
  3. The third is automatically guilty because others attended
  4. No case against any accused can ever proceed
  5. The prosecutor may enter the third’s plea privately

Legal references

  • People v. Caloring, G.R.250980, March15 2022: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2022/mar2022/gr_250980_2022.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.