Philippine Bar review · Topic
Reopening of Proceedings
Page 2 of practice questions on Reopening of Proceedings in Trial (Rule 119). Browse published questions and explore related topics for Philippine Bar review.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Does Section24 make agreement of both parties an express prerequisite to a judge’s own-initiative reopening?
- An order grants reopening on June1. Counsel argues the thirty-day period starts only on a later first hearing date. Whi…
- A judge grants reopening before finality after hearing to avoid a miscarriage of justice. A party objects solely becaus…
- A reopening order directs a first hearing on day29 and proposes completing additional proceedings months later. Counsel…
- A party asks reopening solely to repeat a tactical argument already fully heard and identifies no possible miscarriage …
- Distinguish commencement from termination when applying Section24’s thirty-day requirement.
- A party claims no one requested reopening, so judicial initiative is necessarily unauthorized. Discuss the express powe…
- Explain why a timely reopening request is not automatically meritorious when it merely seeks a tactical second presenta…