Philippine Bar review · Topic
Reopening of Proceedings
Explore Reopening of Proceedings in Trial (Rule 119) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Until when does Rule119 Section24 permit the described reopening?
- What purpose does Section24 state for reopening?
- Does Section24 require a hearing when the judge acts on its own initiative?
- A judge proposes reopening before conviction becomes final but without hearing, solely because the judge initiated it. …
- A party asks to reopen long after the conviction has become final, relying solely on Section24. No exceptional independ…
- Before finality, a party identifies a substantial matter potentially preventing a miscarriage of justice and requests r…
- A court validly reopens before finality. One party proposes leaving the reopened proceedings unresolved indefinitely be…
- State the principal limits of reopening under Section24.
- Why does judicial initiative not excuse a hearing for reopening?
- Explain why Section24 is not a general postfinality remedy.
- Does the thirty-day limit in Section24 concern terminating the reopened proceedings rather than merely starting them?
- What event is the stated starting point for Section24’s thirty-day termination period?