Practice question
A party asks reopening solely to repeat a tactical argument already fully heard and identifies no possible miscarriage of justice. It claims timeliness alone creates a right to reopening. Which is correct?
- Every timely request must be granted
- Timeliness alone does not establish the rule’s stated purpose or entitlement
- Any repeated argument conclusively proves injustice
- The court has no role in evaluating purpose
- Only filing fees determine reopening
Legal references
- Rule119 Sections12–18,23–24: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.