Philippine Bar review · Topic
Inquest
Explore Inquest in Preliminary Investigation (Rule 112, partly repealed by AM 24-02-09-SC; Department of Justice [DOJ] DC 15 and 28, s. 2024) for the…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What is an inquest under D.C. No. 015, series of 2024?
- Under D.C. No. 015, Section 13(d), a respondent opting for preliminary investigation during inquest must sign which wai…
- Does execution of the Article 125 waiver to obtain preliminary investigation during inquest prevent the respondent from…
- At the initial inquest evaluation, the prosecution office determines that the warrantless arrest was invalid. Under D.C…
- A valid warrantless-arrest referral lacks required evidence. The referring officers fail to complete it within the appl…
- During inquest, a represented respondent elects preliminary investigation and executes the Article 125 waiver in counse…
- The parties and prosecution office have access to suitable ICT. An inquest is held by videoconference. Counsel argues t…
- Explain the two principal determinations made in an inquest resolution under D.C. No. 015, Section 13(e).
- A person lawfully arrested without a warrant requests preliminary investigation at inquest. State the protections and c…
- Distinguish release for an invalid warrantless arrest from release because an otherwise valid arrest referral remains i…
- Under DC 015’s Section 5 as quoted in Meking, does the stated prima facie evidence with reasonable certainty of convict…
- At inquest, does the standard quoted in Meking require the prosecutor to consider admissibility of the evidence?