Philippine Bar review · Topic

Inquest

Explore Inquest in Preliminary Investigation (Rule 112, partly repealed by AM 24-02-09-SC; Department of Justice [DOJ] DC 15 and 28, s. 2024) for the…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What is an inquest under D.C. No. 015, series of 2024?
  2. Under D.C. No. 015, Section 13(d), a respondent opting for preliminary investigation during inquest must sign which wai…
  3. Does execution of the Article 125 waiver to obtain preliminary investigation during inquest prevent the respondent from…
  4. At the initial inquest evaluation, the prosecution office determines that the warrantless arrest was invalid. Under D.C…
  5. A valid warrantless-arrest referral lacks required evidence. The referring officers fail to complete it within the appl…
  6. During inquest, a represented respondent elects preliminary investigation and executes the Article 125 waiver in counse…
  7. The parties and prosecution office have access to suitable ICT. An inquest is held by videoconference. Counsel argues t…
  8. Explain the two principal determinations made in an inquest resolution under D.C. No. 015, Section 13(e).
  9. A person lawfully arrested without a warrant requests preliminary investigation at inquest. State the protections and c…
  10. Distinguish release for an invalid warrantless arrest from release because an otherwise valid arrest referral remains i…
  11. Under DC 015’s Section 5 as quoted in Meking, does the stated prima facie evidence with reasonable certainty of convict…
  12. At inquest, does the standard quoted in Meking require the prosecutor to consider admissibility of the evidence?