Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Topic

Inquest

Page 2 of practice questions on Inquest in Preliminary Investigation (Rule 112, partly repealed by AM 24-02-09-SC; Department of Justice [DOJ] DC 15 and 28…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. A valid arrest is referred for inquest. Does custody alone establish the identity and every element of the alleged offe… Multiple Choice Easy
  2. An inquest file contains credible testimony about an incident but no evidence linking the arrested person to it. What d… Multiple Choice Medium
  3. The only material supporting an essential element cannot lawfully be admitted, and no independent admissible proof is a… Multiple Choice Medium
  4. An inquest prosecutor expects a vital item to disappear and be unavailable at trial, with no lawful means to preserve o… Multiple Choice Hard
  5. Does an inquest finding meeting DC 015’s charging standard automatically bind the trial judge to convict? Multiple Choice Hard
  6. Explain the evidence evaluation applicable to an inquest under DC 015, Section 5 as quoted in Meking. Essay Medium
  7. A valid arrest referral proves an offense occurred but supplies no reliable identification of the arrested person as it… Essay Medium
  8. Why does an affirmative inquest resolution not amount to an automatic criminal conviction? Essay Medium