Philippine Bar review · Topic

Remedy When Denied

Explore Remedy When Denied in Bail (Rule 114) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Is an interlocutory bail denial automatically challenged through an ordinary appeal from a final judgment?
  2. What kind of defect can support the Rule65 challenge to a bail denial discussed in Leviste?
  3. Does merely alleging grave abuse guarantee reversal of a bail denial?
  4. A convicted appellant challenges bail denial solely because the court reached a different lawful discretionary conclusi…
  5. A petitioner invokes Rule65 after bail denial but has an unexhausted plain, speedy and adequate ordinary remedy and sho…
  6. A bail order is attacked with facts establishing an arbitrary refusal to perform a required judicial duty. The proper R…
  7. An appellant petitions for certiorari against discretionary bail denial, arguing only that no Section5 listed circumsta…
  8. Describe the qualified Rule65 remedy against an interlocutory bail denial.
  9. Explain why the words grave abuse cannot substitute for facts in a bail challenge.
  10. Distinguish review of bail denial from review of the conviction’s ultimate merits.
  11. A proper Rule 65 petition challenges a bail denial. Does filing it alone automatically stay the criminal case?
  12. What filing period does Rule 65, Section 4 ordinarily prescribe from notice of the assailed order, absent a qualifying …