Practice question
An appellant petitions for certiorari against discretionary bail denial, arguing only that no Section5 listed circumstance exists. It supplies no separate showing of grave abuse. Which is best?
- Certiorari necessarily succeeds
- The argument alone is insufficient because absence of listed circumstances does not compel bail
- The bail denial necessarily proves guilt beyond every doubt
- Every listed circumstance must be presumed
- A discretionary denial can never be challenged on any facts
Legal references
- Leviste v. CA, G.R.189122, March17 2010: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/mar2010/gr_189122_2010.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.