Practice question
A bail order is attacked with facts establishing an arbitrary refusal to perform a required judicial duty. The proper Rule65 conditions and procedural prerequisites are met. The respondent says interlocutory orders are absolutely immune from review. Which is best?
- The absolute immunity theory is incorrect; a proper grave-abuse challenge may be considered
- All interlocutory orders are forever unreviewable
- Every petition must nevertheless win automatically
- The case must immediately end in acquittal
- The petitioner may ignore the order before lawful relief
Legal references
- Leviste v. CA, G.R.189122, March17 2010: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/mar2010/gr_189122_2010.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.