Philippine Bar review · Topic

Requisites

Explore Requisites in Judicial Review for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Which is an ordinary requisite for constitutional judicial review?
  2. What does ordinary standing generally require of the challenger?
  3. What does the lis mota requirement concern?
  4. A final agency order directly requires Mila's business to pay a disputed fee under the challenged law next week. She co…
  5. A court can fully decide a payment dispute by applying a clear contractual term. The constitutional challenge to an unr…
  6. An association asks the Court to invalidate a law but identifies no member subject to it, no threatened enforcement aga…
  7. A litigant knew the statute and all relevant facts when the action began. He deliberately omitted any constitutional ob…
  8. Identify the ordinary four requisites for constitutional judicial review stated in Francisco v. House of Representative…
  9. Explain why a real threat of direct enforcement can matter to standing even before the claimant has paid a charge or su…
  10. A statute's constitutionality is extensively debated in briefs, but the case can be fully resolved on a clear nonconsti…
  11. In Francisco, a legislator may assert standing to question official action claimed to infringe what?
  12. Under Francisco’s discussion, is the ordinary civil-procedure concept of real party in interest identical in all respec…