Practice question
Identify the ordinary four requisites for constitutional judicial review stated in Francisco v. House of Representatives. Explain briefly why these are not replaced merely by calling an issue important.
Legal references
- 1987 Constitution, Article VIII, Section 1: https://lawphil.net/consti/cons1987.html
- Francisco v. House of Representatives, G.R. No. 160261 and consolidated cases, November 10, 2003, main opinion, Essential Requisites for Judicial Review: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2003/nov2003/gr_160261_2003.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.