Philippine Bar review · Topic
Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine
Page 2 of practice questions on Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine in Due Process. Browse published questions and explore related topics for Philippine Bar review.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which question is distinct from whether a prohibition is sufficiently clear under the vagueness doctrine?
- A regulatory penalty becomes payable three years after a recorded approval date. That date is undisputed. An accused id…
- Counsel challenges the words combination and series in the Plunder Law solely because the law does not separately defin…
- A criminal provision clearly defines prohibited operation of an identified device without a specified permit. The defen…
- An ordinance penalizes moving through a plaza in an improper style. It supplies no definition, settled meaning, example…
- A defendant disputes whether he performed an act that a concededly clear penal provision prohibits. Explain why that di…
- Explain why a legal rule tied to an ascertainable approval date is not necessarily vague merely because applying it req…
- An argument treats every undefined statutory word as void and forbids resort to ordinary meaning or context. Explain wh…