Practice question
Which question is distinct from whether a prohibition is sufficiently clear under the vagueness doctrine?
- Whether its text and context provide notice
- Whether the prosecution proved that the accused actually performed the prohibited act
- Whether enforcement standards exist
- Whether ordinary construction clarifies the rule
- Whether the challenged language has a comprehensible meaning
Legal references
- People v. Nazario, G.R. No. L-44143, August 31, 1988, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1988/aug1988/gr_l-44143_1988.html
- Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, November 19, 2001, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2001/nov2001/gr_148560_2001.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.