Philippine Bar review · Topic
Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine
Explore Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine in Due Process for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which defect is central to the void-for-vagueness doctrine?
- Which pair states the principal due-process concerns underlying the vagueness doctrine?
- Does every imperfectly phrased law necessarily become void for vagueness?
- A penal ordinance clearly forbids operating a specified commercial machine without the defined annual permit. An accuse…
- An accused challenges one term in a penal statute as vague. The same statute expressly defines that term, and the defin…
- A penal ordinance punishes any act an inspector personally considers unacceptable. It provides no definition, examples,…
- A statute uses a broad phrase, then narrows it through precise definitions and specified prohibited acts. A defendant c…
- Explain the two due-process reasons for invalidating a law for vagueness. Does an enforcer's sincere belief that conduc…
- A penal statute contains an imperfectly phrased term. Its express definitions and surrounding provisions nevertheless m…
- An accused concedes that a penal provision clearly covers his charged conduct and gives adequate enforcement guidance f…
- In Estrada’s main decision, does omission of a separate statutory definition for every ordinary word necessarily make a…
- What did People v. Nazario distinguish from constitutional vagueness when evaluating the tax-payment dates?