Philippine Bar review · Topic

Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine

Explore Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine in Due Process for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Which defect is central to the void-for-vagueness doctrine?
  2. Which pair states the principal due-process concerns underlying the vagueness doctrine?
  3. Does every imperfectly phrased law necessarily become void for vagueness?
  4. A penal ordinance clearly forbids operating a specified commercial machine without the defined annual permit. An accuse…
  5. An accused challenges one term in a penal statute as vague. The same statute expressly defines that term, and the defin…
  6. A penal ordinance punishes any act an inspector personally considers unacceptable. It provides no definition, examples,…
  7. A statute uses a broad phrase, then narrows it through precise definitions and specified prohibited acts. A defendant c…
  8. Explain the two due-process reasons for invalidating a law for vagueness. Does an enforcer's sincere belief that conduc…
  9. A penal statute contains an imperfectly phrased term. Its express definitions and surrounding provisions nevertheless m…
  10. An accused concedes that a penal provision clearly covers his charged conduct and gives adequate enforcement guidance f…
  11. In Estrada’s main decision, does omission of a separate statutory definition for every ordinary word necessarily make a…
  12. What did People v. Nazario distinguish from constitutional vagueness when evaluating the tax-payment dates?