Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine

Multiple Choice Easy Jurisprudence

Practice question

Which defect is central to the void-for-vagueness doctrine?
  1. A law has more than one paragraph
  2. A law lacks comprehensible standards so that ordinary persons must guess at its meaning and application
  3. A law contains any technical word
  4. A law has been amended
  5. A law imposes an unpopular penalty

Legal references

  • 1987 Constitution, Article III, Section 1, due process: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/3/353
  • People v. Nazario, G.R. No. L-44143, August 31, 1988, main decision, comprehensible standards and fair construction: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1988/aug1988/gr_l-44143_1988.html
  • Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, November 19, 2001, main decision, vagueness and statutory context: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2001/nov2001/gr_148560_2001.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.