Philippine Bar review · Topic

Single Impulse Rule

Page 2 of practice questions on Single Impulse Rule in Plurality of Crimes. Browse published questions and explore related topics for Philippine Bar review.

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Is common motive alone the same inquiry as whether one offense was a necessary means to another?
  2. A court finds two separate intentional acts but says only a short interval passed, so distinction is legally impossible…
  3. Conspiracy proves collective responsibility for separate attacks. The defense says that collective attribution necessar…
  4. Conspirators carry out separately directed intentional attacks at the same place seconds apart. The acts are establishe…
  5. A tribunal says a common impulse automatically resolves both Article48 branches. It finds neither one physical act nor …
  6. Distinguish collective liability from a finding of one physical act.
  7. Does Mision prescribe an hour-long interval before intentional acts may be distinct?
  8. Why is the phrase common impulse not a substitute for examining both Article48 branches?