Practice question
A court finds two separate intentional acts but says only a short interval passed, so distinction is legally impossible. Which lesson from Mision applies?
- A brief discernible interval can separate distinct acts
- Only a full year can separate acts
- One room always means one act
- The number of minutes alone replaces the evidence
- A shared motive erases every distinct act
Legal references
- People v Mision GR63480 February26,1991 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1991/feb1991/gr_63480_1991.html
- People v Nelmida GR184500 September11,2012 ENBANC MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2012/sep2012/gr_184500_2012.html
- People v Reyes GR260030 May19,2025 MAIN, Article48 and public-fund falsification: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/may2025/gr_260030_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.