Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Single Impulse Rule

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

Conspirators carry out separately directed intentional attacks at the same place seconds apart. The acts are established as distinct; no necessary-means or special composite basis is asserted. They demand Article48 treatment solely because no long cooling-off interval occurred. Which is correct?
  1. No fixed lengthy interval is required to recognize the proved distinct acts
  2. Every attack within one minute is one physical act
  3. Same place necessarily establishes merger
  4. A long pause is a statutory element of separate liability
  5. A shared objective conclusively supplies Article48

Legal references

  • People v Mision GR63480 February26,1991 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1991/feb1991/gr_63480_1991.html
  • People v Nelmida GR184500 September11,2012 ENBANC MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2012/sep2012/gr_184500_2012.html
  • People v Reyes GR260030 May19,2025 MAIN, Article48 and public-fund falsification: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/may2025/gr_260030_2025.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.